When it comes to BDSM (Bondage and Discipline, Dominance and Submission, Sadism and Masochism) play, it’s not uncommon to wonder if it’s possible to use a gag without the bondage? After all, restraints, whether applied with rope, chains, or other materials, are often part of a BDSM scene, and a gag can easily be part of that. In some ways, gags can be seen as a type of restraint in and of itself.
So, is it possible to use a gag in a BDSM scene without bondage? The short answer is yes, it is possible. One of the most obvious ways to do so is during a “humiliation scene, in which the Dom (dominant) may require the sub (submissive) to wear a gag as a symbol of their servitude. A more sophisticated approach could involve the use of a breath play gag, such as a pump gag, that would restrict the airflow of the sub while still allowing them to be able to breathe.
Not all BDSM scenes involve bondage, and gags can still be used in those types of scenes. In some cases, it could be used as a deterrent or warning, such as when the Dom orders the sub not to speak and to use the gag instead. Gags can also be used to stifle screams or other kinds of vocal responses that can be fun for both the Dom and the sub.
In order to reduce the risk of potential injury or harm, it’s best to ensure that both the Dom and the sub feel comfortable with the idea of using a gag during a BDSM scene. This means discussing the type of gag that will be used, what it will be used for, and what safety precautions should be taken both before and during the scene. If desired, inflatable and breakaway gags can be used for additional safety.
To sum it up, yes, it is possible to use a gag in a BDSM scene without the use of bondage. It’s important to make sure both parties feel comfortable before using a gag, discuss the type of gag that should be used, and take the necessary safety precautions. With proper communication and preparation, it’s possible to enjoy the use of a gag in a BDSM scene without bondage. Official source.
What is the difference between ‘dub-con’ and ‘non-con’ in BDSM comics?
Dub-con and non-con are two terms that are common in the world of bdsm comics. While at first glance these terms may sound similar, they actually have different meanings. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the differences between each term and how they’re used in bdsm comics and other forms of media.
Dub-con, which stands for ‘dubious consent’, describes scenes in which the consent of a BDSM submissive appears to be uncertain or uncertain. While it can be unclear as to whether or not the submissive has consented to the activities, the BDSM master must make an effort to ensure that there was some form of consent before proceeding with an activity. Dub-con does not imply or describe scenes of sexual assault or rape. It simply means that the submissive’s consent is unclear.
Non-con, which stands for ‘non-consensual’, involves scenes in which the BDSM submissive is subjected to activities without their consent. In other words, the BDSM master either fails to make the necessary effort to gain valid consent or ignores the submissive’s clear lack of consent. Non-con can include sexual assault, rape, and other forms of sexual violence.
The use of dub-con and non-con in BDSM comics can vary widely depending on the author’s style and approach. Some authors may opt to use these terms as a way to play with ‘safe words’ and discuss the boundaries between consensual and non-consensual activities within the context of BDSM. Other authors may use these terms to explore the dark side of BDSM and discuss more serious topics such as rape, assault, and abuse.
In conclusion, the difference between dub-con and non-con in BDSM comics is quite simple. Dub-con is used to describe situations in which the consent of the submissive is unclear, while non-con is used to describe scenes in which the submissive is subjected to activities without their consent. The use of these terms can vary greatly between authors and the tone and subject matter of BDSM comics.